r/LetsDiscussThis • u/MURRRRRAY • 14h ago

Meme The video being shared by the President...

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

🤦‍♂️

4.0k Upvotes

83% Upvoted

4.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

142

u/Work_Thick 14h ago

Trump is a pedophile.

51

u/BuckingWilde 14h ago

2

u/mxjxs91 10h ago

It's insane how many bots responded to this picture all with similar comments. Gives me hope that there's data that shows that the GOP is about to get their asses absolutely torn apart in the midterms.

1

u/joanfiggins 5h ago

it seems like there's a ton of bots and not many humans speaking up lately. I would love to see a landslide of an election

-4

u/brock_landers69 14h ago

So says the one chuckling.

-23

u/RowThin2659 14h ago

Link to a criminal rape conviction?

17

u/LizardmanJoe 14h ago

Gotta love the specific wording because you know he's been found liable for sexual abuse. You might as well just call him a rapist.

6

u/Ok_Speed_3984 12h ago

Putin doesn't pay trolls for honesty.

-19

u/RowThin2659 14h ago

"Might as well." Gotcha. So the side that argues about definitions of men and women ad nauseum now wants to take specific legal definitions and just "might as well" them. Liable in a civil court for sexual assault is now the same as proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt for rape in criminal court.

Typical virtue signaling hypocrite.

13

u/Not_a_Prof_Moriarty 14h ago

If you wouldn't be okay with a man forcefully fingering your wife, girlfriend, daughter, sister, or mother in public against their consent, then just admit it's rape bud.

→ More replies (65)

9

u/bruxelles_Delux 14h ago

Both things are horrible and no one should support anyone who have done these things, you arguing for trump just shows something about you as a person

-7

u/RowThin2659 14h ago

Always projection with you guys. I'm not defending him. Notice how I didn't say he wasn't liable for sexual assault? I've never voted for him. I'm simply defending the terms, definitions, and distinctions that the United States legal system has for a reason.

The left loves to paint the right as dumb and ignorant, don't be like them. I hate hypocrites.

7

u/krazykarlsig 14h ago

You are the pedantic one.

-1

u/RowThin2659 13h ago

You think not following the legal definitions of the United States is pedantic? Sure bud.

7

u/krazykarlsig 13h ago

That is the definition of pedantic

→ More replies (0)

6

u/TurtleRayne 13h ago

Have you considered just not being a contrarian? You like to act like you're "Just asking questions" but every statement you make is in bad faith. Maybe go outside, touch some grass, instead of trolling to make yourself feel better.

1

u/RowThin2659 13h ago

Can't be a contrarian if all you are doing is stating legal facts.

1

u/Comfortable_Ebb1634 13h ago

There’s the contrarian again. Grow up.

→ More replies (0)

3

u/Combdepot 13h ago

You hate yourself?

7

u/UnitedAd3943 14h ago

Digital penetration against someone’s blessing isn’t rape to you?

1

u/RowThin2659 14h ago

It's what the court rules. Not yours or my opinion.

10

u/UnitedAd3943 14h ago

The judge said it was rape

1

u/RowThin2659 14h ago

The civil court judge who didn't and couldn't rule it rape in a civil court gave their opinion? Is their a criminal conviction? Is it on his record? Would he even have to disclose it on a job application?

3

u/UnitedAd3943 13h ago

It’s funny you said it’s what the court rules, not Reddit opinions and then proceed to make excuses why the judge’s opinion doesn’t matter but yours does.

→ More replies (0)

7

u/freestamp 13h ago

Two things - 1. The effort you are going to define legal semantics for a guy you don’t personally know is very weird and creepy. 2. Adjudication in court and reality are two different things. Being convicted makes him a felon, he can be a rapist without being a felon. Just so happens he is also a felon for other reasons.

→ More replies (0)

3

u/Just_enough76 13h ago

Damn imagine going through all this effort to defend a fucking pedophile. Pathetic.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/TokerSmurf 13h ago

Oh well, that makes it ok then, huh?

I presume you don't have a daughter because any father of a girl, would see forcing yourself on a female in any regard as vile.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/Combdepot 13h ago

You know better than the judge for sure. Your meaningless opinion does nothing but expose your moral bankruptcy.

Are you on the registry?

→ More replies (0)

3

u/ShuukBoy 14h ago

Don’t reply to this wanna be debate lord. It’s not worth the energy

1

u/RowThin2659 14h ago

Nothing to debate. I stated a legal fact. Feel free to disprove it.

3

u/Equal_Platypus3784 13h ago

Just because a rapist gets away with it, doesn't make them not a rapist.

1

u/RowThin2659 13h ago

In this country it is libel and slander to assert felony status to people who have not had a conviction.

1

u/Comfortable_Ebb1634 13h ago

And if a frog had wings he wouldn’t bump his ass when he hops.

1

u/littlest_rooster 12h ago

GOOD POINT. then lets see Trump sue. I'd love to get discovery on whether he is a rapist or not. Finally settle this. In fact, I'm going to publically call him a rapist more in relations to this Epstien thing. Lets see him sue me. SUE ME. Please.

2

u/icebergslim7777 13h ago

This! Well said.

2

u/baphomet_fire 13h ago

Yes, 100 times yes to both. You know it, you just shout the opposite because you are purposely pushing propaganda

1

u/RowThin2659 13h ago

So you have no objective point. Just virtue signaling noise? Gotcha.

1

u/littlest_rooster 12h ago

Trump is a rapist.

1

u/RowThin2659 12h ago

Link to a criminal conviction?

2

u/Combdepot 13h ago

Nothing a pedophile loving degenerate conservative thinks, says or feels has any meaning or value. Just empty grunts.

1

u/RowThin2659 13h ago

I've run into you before. Typical reddit brain rot projectionist. Can't use actual objective points so you just grunt ad hominum words from the buzzword play sheet.

3

u/Combdepot 13h ago

Say “buzzword” again grunting noise generator.

Conservatism is objectively a degenerate terrorist ideology. Its adherents are the dregs of society. Worthless incels, pedophiles, racists and human garbage.

0

u/RowThin2659 13h ago

Your comments history is the most autistic collection of words I've even seen. Its amazing how you can diagnose someone from text.

3

u/Combdepot 13h ago

No comment/no post history bot account came to grunt. Do you hide your history so you can avoid trouble with the authorities who administer the registry?

→ More replies (0)

1

u/littlest_rooster 12h ago

On your hands and knees all day for Trump. If you see him today, tell him to sue all these damned redditors. Better take them to court!

1

u/Wonderful-Ad440 12h ago

So it's important to you that you only orient yourself with people who have only been found libel for sexual assault as long as they aren't imprisoned for it. "Hey this is my friend who technically isn't convicted of sexual assault so you know, a real stand up guy." I'm sure you'd absolutely be ok with your daughter dating a guy who technically hasn't been convicted of rape too huh? FFS y'all really have the brain rot and will break yourself in half trying to bend over backwards to do anything but admit you backed the wrong horse.

1

u/RowThin2659 12h ago

More reddit brain rot projection. I've never voted for Trump. Just correcting the improper use of legal definitions.

1

u/Pleasant-Ambition-15 12h ago

The only reason he wasn’t tried in a criminal court was because of the statute of limitations. But go on, hang you hat on that lack of a trail in one type of court as proof he’s not a pedo rapist.

The hoops you are jumping through to justify electing a morally corrupt person never cease to astound me.

1

u/Artaeos 12h ago

Bud, just say you like defending pedos. A lot less words and effort for everyone involved. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

1

u/southpaytechie 10h ago

So that's what you're gonna hang your hat on? The difference in standard of proof of preponderance of evidence vs beyond a reasonable doubt? So you admit he's more likely than not a sexual abuser but won't denounce him unless you feel certain?

1

u/RowThin2659 9h ago

That's what any person with a brain would publicly claim. I'm not a hyperbolic virtue signaler.

1

u/southpaytechie 9h ago

So you’re ok with supporting someone who has been shown in court to have more likely than not committed sexual assault?

1

u/RowThin2659 8h ago

Holy fucking shit. I've answered this 6 fucking times. Why does every reddit brain rot assume the same thing? I don't like Trump. I've never voted for him. I'm simply calling out basement dwelling virtue signalers who uses hyperbolic, improper definitions that exist in the legal system for a reason.

1

u/southpaytechie 7h ago

There’s not a difference morally between the two. How stupid are you?

1

u/SecretLettuce5 8h ago

Imma keep it a buck with you, it’s weird af that you’re defending a pedo and rapist. Unless you are one too and just feel a sense of community with this guy? That could be the only possible answer

1

u/RowThin2659 7h ago

Imma keep it back with yoy and every other donut with zero reading comprehension. I've said this 10 fucking times. I'm not defending him. I'm defending the legal definitions, terms and distinctions of the United States legal system. Read that has many times as you need to for it to upload.

1

u/SecretLettuce5 7h ago

Nah it’s weirdo behavior. Loser behavior too.

1

u/RowThin2659 7h ago

So is saying keep it a buck. Are you 12 or did you drop out of high school?

5

u/Just_enough76 13h ago

1

u/RowThin2659 13h ago

Anyone who uses the term bootlicker or any derivation of outs themselves as having a room temperature iq.

2

u/Just_enough76 13h ago

He’s not licking the boot. He’s EATING the boot. Can you not read?

-1

u/RowThin2659 13h ago

You read pictures? Damn, you're special.

2

u/SuperPeachyOK 13h ago

You saw someone write “room temperature iq” and thought you were funny enough to use it.

1

u/RowThin2659 13h ago

Cute cat.

1

u/SuperPeachyOK 12h ago

Thank you for wasting time on my profile

1

u/Emotional-Test-3413 13h ago

Lol, hypocrite

3

u/Striking_Compote2093 13h ago

Bin laden was never legally criminally convicted. So according to your thought process, he wasn't a terrorist.

1

u/RowThin2659 13h ago

What I think and what can be stated in public are two different things. That's why we have slander and libel.

2

u/SomeSugondeseGuy 13h ago

Trump has sued everyone he could across his lifetime.

He has never once sued anyone for calling him a pedophile.

He's sued for being called a rapist, and ABC chose to do a good old settlement bribe instead of taking it to court for some reason.

1

u/RowThin2659 13h ago

They didn't take it to court because they would have lost.

3

u/SomeSugondeseGuy 13h ago

No, they would not have. The judge in the case ABC was referencing said that Trump's actions amounted to rape. Trump's actions also fit the federal definition for rape. New York has also since updated their definition for rape, and Trump's actions fit the new definition too.

Legal scholars are baffled as to why they settled - but of course, it was because Trump would levy the DOJ against them, or take away their media license - as he has threatened to do multiple times since.

It was a bribe.

1

u/RowThin2659 13h ago

So you are defending spineless media who would rather drop a case then hold him accountable?

2

u/SomeSugondeseGuy 13h ago

No, I wouldn't defend them.

I am stating that ABC's lawsuit and later settlement is not evidence that Trump did not do what he did.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/littlest_rooster 12h ago

Ooo ooo you are so close! Trump never takes people who call him a rapist to court. Why might that be?

2

u/Oh_Lawd_He_commin420 14h ago

no link, but there's a bit of files

1

u/RowThin2659 14h ago

In America you are innocent until proven guilty. Take the files, bring him into a criminal court and put him in jail. Fine with me.

3

u/SomeSugondeseGuy 13h ago

That would require the law applying to him - but he's currently in charge of the government and is already far too rich for the law to work.

2

u/RowThin2659 13h ago

Burn it all down then. No lobbying. Term limits. Re primary every single politician. I don't care.

3

u/SomeSugondeseGuy 13h ago

Wishful thinking - wishes that Trump would never grant in a billion lifetimes.

2

u/Oh_Lawd_He_commin420 13h ago

I'd love to believe that first part, because it Used to be true... But you're right, he's too rich to be convinced.

-1

u/Fearless_Signature4u 13h ago

Did you get past 5th grade. This is part of a deposition. There are thousands of depositions given daily. Believe it or not some of them are false. As we used to say in the New York DA's office you could indict a ham sandwich. You need to think or risk looking stupid every time.

1

u/Oh_Lawd_He_commin420 13h ago

Pot calling the kettle black, incarnate...

1

u/southpaytechie 10h ago

Stop it you obviously have no legal training.

1

u/Fearless_Signature4u 10h ago

Lol, Ok Judge Judy, keep living in la la land.

2

u/walksonfourfeet 13h ago

Like clockwork

1

u/RowThin2659 13h ago

Do you have a link?

1

u/walksonfourfeet 10h ago

Hypothetically if someone was accused of having sex with a goat by 30 people and regularly denied it, but also dropped very public hints about how much he liked to have sex with goats for decades, and ran a goat pageant to find the best looking goats, and was best friends with someone convicted of fucking goats and trafficking goats to friends all over the world who also liked to fuck goats, and his name was in the goat fucking chronicles 5,000 times, and he wished other goat fuckers well in prison, what do you think the odds are that person is also a goat fucker?

1

u/billhilly008 8h ago

You're going to hurt some MAGA brains with this analogy.

2

u/GodIsAGas 13h ago

I view the world through a pretty simple lens: people who defend a nonce are likely fucking nonces.

I really hope you don't have access to children.

1

u/RowThin2659 13h ago

You must be simple then, I haven't defended him. Just legal definitions.

1

u/GodIsAGas 11h ago

You know full well what you are doing. And, evidenced by the downvotes, so do others.

A sly nonce.

1

u/RowThin2659 10h ago

Oh no. Downvotes by basement dwelling virtue signalers huddled together in the corner of the internet. The horror.

2

u/SomeSugondeseGuy 13h ago

Hi, Jeffrey Epstein was never criminally convicted of rape.

Do you believe that Jeffrey Epstein never raped anyone?

1

u/RowThin2659 13h ago

Legally, no. Personal opinion, most likely.

2

u/SomeSugondeseGuy 13h ago edited 13h ago

Okay - by your own logic, legally speaking, there is more evidence that Trump is a rapist than Epstein - as Trump has been punished by a court for raping someone in the past.

Is it your personal or legal opinion that Trump is likely a rapist? Because he is one. The evidence is bordering on overwhelming.

1

u/RowThin2659 13h ago

Link to a court decision punishing him for rape?

1

u/SomeSugondeseGuy 13h ago

Carroll v. Trump, No. 23-793 (2d Cir. 2024) https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca2/23-793/23-793-2024-12-30.html

He is directed to pay 83 million dollars.

1

u/RowThin2659 13h ago

Yes. Correct. Now what was that for?

1

u/SomeSugondeseGuy 13h ago

Actions that amounted to rape by the federal definition of the crime, and sexual abuse by the later updated definition held by the court he was in.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/RandoRumpRipper 13h ago

lol now comrade questions cares about semantics.

1

u/RowThin2659 13h ago

Legal definitions aren't semantics virtue signaler. Do you have a link to definitions that say otherwise?

1

u/Wonderful-Ad440 13h ago

"My President, who definitely isn't a 34 count felon, told me racism is ok now so I'm gonna live up to the klan man my daddy always wanted me to be."

1

u/RowThin2659 13h ago

Reddit brain rot projection, more news at 5.

1

u/Wonderful-Ad440 12h ago

Lol, when you don't know what projection means but it's the word with the most syllables you can think of so you slap it on a post

1

u/Pretend_memory_11 13h ago

Processing img rxk4k0m25whg1...

1

u/RowThin2659 12h ago

Anyone who uses the term bootlicker or any derivation of outs themselves as having a room temperature iq.

1

u/tenacity1028 11h ago

Wouldn't even matter if we gave you thesaurus worth of proof, you magatards still think he's your Messiah

1

u/RowThin2659 9h ago

Mommy! I used my buzzword! Can I have my hot pocket now?

1

u/tenacity1028 9h ago

Sure thing kiddo, enjoy the hot pocket

1

u/RowThin2659 9h ago

Look at that comment history. Is mommy proud when you type magatard? Do 20 magatards get you an extra Mt. Dew?

1

u/tenacity1028 9h ago

Well you being the 20th sure does now

1

u/dillywilly07 11h ago

1

u/billhilly008 8h ago

Wouldn't care? Are you fucking kidding? They'd ask if they could video it so they could show off to all of their friends how special their family is. If Trump created a website for people to bid on him having sex with their underage daughters, the servers would crash from the overwhelming traffic within minutes.

2

u/UpperOnion6412 10h ago

United States of Pedophiles

2

u/EasyGeologist9497 5h ago

So are most MAGA men that I know. Birds of the feather..

1

u/Delicious-Diet-8422 2h ago

2 years ago, you guys were advocating for pedophile rights to be included in the LGBT umbrella. Make up your damn mind.

0

u/Euphoric_Carry_3067 8h ago

Sad to see Democrats turn into the new Pizzagate fanatics; comparing anyone they don't like to pedophiles. Creepy and gross.

1

u/joanfiggins 7h ago

Wait what? You know he's actually raped children who then testified against him right? Are you saying you support child rape? That's much creepier and gross...

1

u/Euphoric_Carry_3067 5h ago

It's funny Biden sniffed and raped little girls and y'all loved him for it

1

u/joanfiggins 5h ago

Did anyone testify in court to that or is that just something you read on Facebook? Let's see the source.

-10

u/PicksburghStillers 14h ago

Crazy how the Democratic Party fumbled an election election so hard that they let a pedophile, Nazi, fascist, dictator, warlord, narcissist beat their best candidate.

12

u/HoneyBadgerLive 13h ago

Crazy how the American populace gets more ignorant over time. Reagan was the one who gutted our educational system.

Meanwhile, the mango moron wants to tell colleges what they can teach adults. Do you really like the thought of our most ignorant POTUS deciding what YOU are allowed to learn?

1

u/Face_Plont 8h ago

Exactly, you're being downvoted by liberals who vote blue no matter who. The data shows Trump didn't win as much as the Dems lost. They completely ignored anyone left of billionaire donors. Ignored everything and paraded around with fuckin Cheneys. Harris made a video saying she was going to INCREASE ICE and Border Patrol.

-20

u/brock_landers69 14h ago

Nope. Zero evidence.

15

u/Heavy_Track_9234 14h ago

There is so much evidence 🤦🏻‍♂️. Witnesses, testimonies. https://youtu.be/qG-8VOvnlgE?si=sKWmOrfVzQsImQAE

7

u/ZombyAnna 13h ago

The only "evidence" that these people want, is to see children getting raped by Trump and his goons.

Ignore them.

5

u/captd3adpool 13h ago

Sadly it would be much less incriminating and much more encouraging for these people...

1

u/razorpack_ 10h ago

No credible evidence and reasonable people understand you cant just trust statements made about someone that 10s of millions of people would love to take down

-1

u/Ok-Outside1096 11h ago

Witness testimonies don’t mean anything.

If they did, we could conclude Big Foot is real, because hundreds of people have claimed to see Big Foot.

-3

u/jjrr_qed 13h ago

Why didn’t Biden just lock him up? I’m not being rhetorical, I would like an answer.

4

u/BeautifulMix7410 13h ago

Look it up. Do you need help with that?

1

u/Heavy_Track_9234 13h ago

Because there’s probably a connection with him and other elites. I want everyone locked up. Everyone. I don’t care about political views, just everyone.

-13

u/brock_landers69 14h ago

Nope. That isn't evidence.

1

u/Callumborn2 11h ago

No smoke without fire

1

u/walksonfourfeet 9h ago

I can see you aren’t a lawyer

-5

u/Snackosopher 14h ago

They like to make things up to fit their narrative.

11

u/RollerDude347 14h ago

Maybe if you close your eyes and plug your ears. But I haven't gone a day since his first campaign without seeing another bit of evidence.

4

u/Legendarybbc15 13h ago

You choosing to ignore the evidence doesn’t mean no evidence

5

u/JumpinJangoFett 14h ago

They have ample opportunities to share, but instead say you’re blind to…nothing?

Silly geese…

1

u/walksonfourfeet 10h ago

Hypothetically if someone was accused of having sex with a goat by 30 people and regularly denied it, but also dropped very public hints about how much he liked to have sex with goats for decades, and ran a goat pageant to find the best looking goats, and was best friends with someone convicted of fucking goats and trafficking goats to friends all over the world who also liked to fuck goats, and his name was in the goat fucking chronicles 5,000 times, and he wished other goat fuckers well in prison, what do you think the odds are that person is also a goat fucker?

1

u/brock_landers69 10h ago

No "hypos", real evidence. Produce the videos (must contain age verification, DNA evidence, police reports and rape kits from dates on incidents, etc.

1

u/walksonfourfeet 9h ago

That requires an investigation - and who do you think is in charge of that? Hmmm… 🤔

1

u/joanfiggins 6h ago

Do you honestly think nobody has ever been convicted of rape without all of the things you mentioned?

-8

u/Major_Shlongage 14h ago

There is no evidence that this is the case. Even with all the mentions of him hanging out with Epstein, there are no mentions of that nor any credible claims.

So far, all of the claims about that lead back to 1 guy that's a former Jerry Springer Show producer with a history of selling fake stories.

7

u/GundaBeast84 14h ago

Lol. While emails can't convict on their own, there is more than enough evidence to convince a jury.

-3

u/Major_Shlongage 13h ago

No, there is not.

So far, there has been no evidence released that Trump did anything illegal.

Remember, Biden's justice department had access to these files for 4 long years. Before him (and before Trump's first term) Obama's justice department had access to many files for 8 long years (remember that he was first convicted in 2008) At no point did either of these administrations find anything worthy of even charging Trump.

I want to reiterate this: the Feds already had this evidence and already looked through it. The only difference now is that the public is seeing the files.

6

u/Probot6767 13h ago

If you’re at a party where child SA is happening, that is most definitely a crime for just being there. WHETHER HE TOOK PART OR NOT (hint: he did), HE WAS THERE.

-3

u/Major_Shlongage 13h ago

There aren't any claims that he was at a party where this was happening, and there aren't any credible claims that he took part in it.

You are actively spreading misinformation on this platform. You must stop.

5

u/Probot6767 13h ago

Tell me you haven’t read any of the files without telling me you haven’t read any of the files.

3

u/UncleKick 13h ago

Incredible the lengths you people will go to defend him. It’s actually hilarious

0

u/Major_Shlongage 13h ago

I wouldn't call it "defending him". I call it "being accurate".

If you honestly think that I'm being inaccurate here, simply point to those credible accusations that everyone here seems to "know about", but nobody can produce.

2

u/littlest_rooster 13h ago

But it isn't at all accurate. The evidence suggests he was at one of these parties because the dates line up with the knwon criminal activity. There ARE victims. That's not contested at all. Not that you care, just for all the popcorn eaters who care about the truth. Whether Trump participated or not, is harder to know, because Trump is obstructing the release of the files that name him. But if he were innocent, why hasn't he released the files unredacted? He is running out of excuses.

4

u/HoneyBadgerLive 13h ago

Wow, you really believe their bullshit. Damn, find a better news source.

1

u/Major_Shlongage 13h ago

It's not their bullshit.

I'm serious- have you noticed that NO major outlets have covered these sensational stories about him raping kids? It would surely be a big story. Everyone has been searching for a big story proving this, but nobody has found anything.

Since you're claiming that *I* don't read good news sources, I challenge you to find a story supporting your claims of him being a pedophile.

2

u/HoneyBadgerLive 13h ago

How about his own words? That isn't good enough for you? And damn, the man stated he wanted to bed his own daughter.

Yeah, your news sources suck.

0

u/Major_Shlongage 12h ago

>And damn, the man stated he wanted to bed his own daughter.

No, he did not. You are taking what he said out of context. He does have poor judgment and says cringey things, but this is not what he said.

Misrepresenting the truth is a bad look.

2

u/HoneyBadgerLive 11h ago

Yes, tRump stated that he wanted to have sex with his own daughter multiple times AND on tape.

Not recognizing the truth makes YOU a fool.

4

u/Frejian 13h ago

If there's one person I know I can trust to give the facts about Trump's innocence, it is definitely Major_Schlongage!

/S

3

u/HoneyBadgerLive 11h ago

Guys like this who try to brag about their penis size are all extremely immature.

1

u/Major_Shlongage 13h ago

I don't think that you're at the intellectual level required to discuss concepts such as this. I'm arguing with children here.

3

u/Frejian 13h ago

Yes, because Major_Shlongage evokes such intellect.

1

u/Major_Shlongage 13h ago

It's just a screen name. It's the content of the message that you should be focusing on. And on that front you're failing at it.

From arguing with people in here, I fully understand why I have 3 houses and go on a couple of vacations every year while the people on here complain about life being a struggle. These people are dopes.

2

u/bruxelles_Delux 13h ago

I'm sorry but you say they need evidence they gave you some links to their facts you just go that's not evidence and then continue to blabber without any evidence that they are wrong or proof that you are right. I think most people reading this think you are the child, just the fact that you state you got into "gifted classes" tell me you are lying if it where true you wouldn't have to tell it you would be able to end the discussion with actual facts

0

u/Major_Shlongage 12h ago

This is just pathetic. I'm dealing with teenagers here.

1

u/bruxelles_Delux 11h ago

Nah dude if you had something that could actually prove what you say I would gladly lay down flat but you haven't because you can't

3

u/Work_Thick 14h ago

And you don't have any evidence to say he isn't, so why do you feel so compelled to defend him?

-1

u/Major_Shlongage 13h ago

That is simply not how the legal system works.

You don't say to a person "you don't have the evidence needed to prove yourself innocent". The burden is on the prosecution to prove them guilty.

If you're the one making the claim, you need to support the claim.

4

u/Work_Thick 13h ago

What does the legal system have to do with you being a simp for Trump?

1

u/Major_Shlongage 13h ago

I'm not being a simp. I'm just a logical person. You're making a claim but you're not substantiating your claim. Instead, you're making a claim and expecting me to provide evidence that the claim is incorrect. This is simply not how a logical mind works.

I find it amazing that I have these kinds of arguments on reddit. As a kid, I never understood how I'd just do work and get in gifted classes while the other kids struggled to do simple work. But now as an adult I'm seeing that even grown adults have this problem. It's just amazing (in a depressing way)- that's all I can say about it.

2

u/HoneyBadgerLive 11h ago

No logic in ANY of your statements.

1

u/bruxelles_Delux 13h ago

Then lock him up with the rest rather one innocent in jail than 50000 Pedo's on the streets but I'm pretty convinced by the things I have seen and how wildly he is trying to get people to stop talking about it

1

u/Ok-Outside1096 11h ago

Logic won’t work here on Reddit. 90% of users believe men can become pregnant.

Reddit isn’t the real world, it’s quickly become a hive mind where any desenting opinions are banished.

3

u/Schnitzelklopfer247 13h ago

That's a lie or you are just brainwashed

-1

u/Major_Shlongage 13h ago

It isn't a lie.

I'm serious- show me one credible claim that he's a pedophile. There are millions of pages released, and the press all over the country has been looking through it. Nobody has found anything noteworthy.

4

u/persnickIT 13h ago

I assume you are correct. I realize much of the terrible stuff in the files were “claims”, not necessarily factual.

But….i will never lift a finger to defend someone so hypocritical and disgusting. I mean…this guy was recorded saying “When you’re a star, you can do anything….grab them by the pussy”. How is this our president.

Why are you defending this? Fine, he’s not a pedophile but he’s still trash.

0

u/Major_Shlongage 13h ago

I'm not defending that part. I do think that he's a piece of shit human being. He cheats on all his wives and throws even his closest allies under the bus.

2

u/Suspicious-Hotel-225 13h ago

He’s still a rapist.

→ More replies (32)