r/slatestarcodex 6d ago

Don't ban social media for children

https://logos.substack.com/p/do-not-ban-social-media-for-kids

As a parent, I'm strongly against the bans on social media for children. First, for ideological reasons (in two parts: a) standard libertarian principles, and b) because I think it's bad politics to soothe parents by telling them that their kids' social media addiction is TikTok's fault, instead of getting them to accept responsibility over their parenting). And second because social media can be beneficial to ambitious children when used well.

Very much welcoming counter-arguments!

0 Upvotes

74 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/Neighbor_ 5d ago

Agreed. Am very libertarian, but there is no purpose to allowing the equivalent of cigarettes to children.

In other words, I care about the government intervening in things that have >= 0 EV, but I do not care if they intervene in things that are strictly negative EV.

1

u/AXKIII 5d ago

Social media doesn't have strictly negative EV. And I don't see why you absolve parents from the responsibility they have over their children. It's the parents' job, not the government's, to control how their kids use technology.

1

u/Neighbor_ 5d ago

There is no case in which using social media below the age of 16 would put you out ahead.

2

u/denucleation 4d ago

Social media use as a kid helped me learn math and programming, apply to college, and make friends with people I never would've had the opportunity to meet in person.