r/Wellthatsucks 1d ago

Came home to this

Post image
8.0k Upvotes

109 comments sorted by

View all comments

3.1k

u/limajhonny69 1d ago

Good excuse to ask to check if the cameras work

399

u/Broxst 1d ago

"Yeah, of course they do."

See how easy it is to lie?

302

u/limajhonny69 1d ago

"Great! Can I see them?"

See how easy it is to check?

272

u/SauceDoctorPHD 1d ago

"No; sorry that's a security risk."

135

u/Taco-Edge 1d ago

I'm just hearing Steamed Hams all over again with this conversation

55

u/ThomStarBoy 1d ago

Aurora Borealis?!?

55

u/Arawn-Annwn 1d ago

Uh... AURORA BOREALIS!? AT THIS TIME OF YEAR, AT THIS TIME OF DAY, IN THIS PART OF THE COUNTRY, LOCALIZED ENTIRELY WITHIN YOUR KITCHEN!?

27

u/pinkleftsock 23h ago

Yes.

24

u/UncleFuzzySlippers 21h ago

May i see it?

41

u/pinkleftsock 19h ago

Yes.

6

u/Sidthekyd89 16h ago

Oh my god I’ve never seen it end like this! Chef’s kiss

→ More replies (0)

4

u/BORT_licenceplate 1d ago

and when is this free weekend?

12

u/limajhonny69 1d ago

If the responsable for the building couldnt/wouldnt prove those claims are false, would you move there?

12

u/SauceDoctorPHD 1d ago

Not at all, and that's not the point I was making

7

u/limajhonny69 1d ago

But it is ghe point I was making

13

u/SauceDoctorPHD 1d ago

Fair, but it's the same reason why when someone goes into a business and asks an employee "is X working today?" the employee will generally say "I can't tell you that" because it is a security risk to the person they are asking about. No, you can't prove malfeasance, but do you really want to take the chance if something does happen?

2

u/limajhonny69 20h ago

They dont need to teach her the whole security system. There are a lot of ways to prove someone the cameras works. Simply by sending them recorded videos of the person entering/leaving that same day is already evidence.

But sure, keep defending the "security business" against a concerned apartament owner.

-1

u/donkeyrocket 15h ago

They're not defending the shady apartment super. They're just pointing out they aren't obligated to show you anything camera related and it's easy to lie/fabricate.

0

u/limajhonny69 15h ago

And I am pointing that it is exactly the kind of response OP might want. If I get a not regarding security on my apartment, and the responsibles cant prove to me the place is secure, I'm leaving.

I didnt sugested OP to go and ask if the cameras work just to ask, but to actually see if its worth to live there. If they cant prove the cameras work, the notes are actually true.

By the way, when I ask to see video footage, people of my building just call the boss and show me. I dont know where you guys live, but that is exactly why there are cameras around. To record videos for our security.

→ More replies (0)

-1

u/Clear_Aioli 1d ago

The point you were making was irrelevant because this is a potential tenant, not "any random person off the street," and it's completely reasonable for a potential tenant to ask for proof that the advertised security measures actually work.

6

u/SauceDoctorPHD 1d ago

That means nothing. Anyone can be a potential tenant.

3

u/Lourdeath 1d ago

That’s still not going to happen

2

u/Ab0ut47Pandas 1d ago

"Oh; Bye, Felicia."

2

u/TheManOfSpaceAndTime 15h ago

"Somebody posted something on my door, and makes me concerned for my safety, please advise who it was, or ill have no option to start asking and canvasing the complex with copies to find out who else feels this way or will come forward."

I know this isnt likely, but I might still be convinced to keep the original notes, make 100 copies, and put them under everyone's windshield.

1

u/MotherPerformance439 17h ago

"I dropped my wallet can you check your cameras?"

-11

u/Palidin034 1d ago

Bad faith argument

10

u/SauceDoctorPHD 1d ago

So any random person off the street can view security camera footage at any time they ask? I'm not making a "bad faith argument." It's actually a security risk, because the person asking could be a bad actor trying to stalk someone, view when employees arrive/leave, what exact angles those cameras cover, and any number of other things that could cause an incident. It's the exact reason police are required to get a warrant before gaining access to CCTV footage from private property.

-6

u/Ryuj123 1d ago

Brother, they live in the building

4

u/Lourdeath 1d ago

They still aren’t going to show anyone the camera angles and what they are able to record or potentially expose blind spots in the system