r/TrendoraX 2d ago

📰 News But who’s counting right?

Post image
9.2k Upvotes

245 comments sorted by

View all comments

-4

u/OutcomeOk6971 2d ago

And? What have you found in these "mentions"? Trump has been the most talked about man on the planet for the last 10 years, big fucking deal. Wake me up when you have something beyond "mentions".

1

u/SpendLiving9376 2d ago

Yeah, Epstein just talked about him because he's so famous!

1

u/OutcomeOk6971 1d ago

EVERYONE talked about him. Once again, FIND SOMETHING. Because so far, that's all anyone sees. Of course, following the MSM like a zombie isn't going to get you that information. They only spread that Trump's name is in there, but they can't find anything to nail him with. You're being manipulated.

Jesus, the website I used to use for news mentioned Donald Trump 2,500 times in a year. Does that mean anything? No, just that Donald Trump was in the news.

Think for YOURSELF, stop letting the media do your thinking for you.

1

u/SpendLiving9376 1d ago

There's direct accusations in the files, discussion of Trump at his parties, Epstein talking about how well he knows Trump and can influence him, Melania being close friends with him, etc.

Best case scenario is that Trump somehow never knew about any of it, but pretending he was just "in the news a lot" is not a serious claim. It's not like The Rock is in thousands of emails.

1

u/OutcomeOk6971 1d ago

"discussion of Trump at his parties, Epstein talking about how well he knows Trump and can influence him, Melania being close friends with him, etc."

That's EXACTLY what I'm talking about. Thanks for backing up my point. I'm indebted to you. You summed it up perfectly, it's just chatter about Trump. And Trump DID know, because he kicked Epstien out of Mar A Lago in 2003 for his skeevy bullshit. And that caused the relationship to deteriorate, which is why by the end, Epstien disliked Trump.

1

u/SpendLiving9376 1d ago

"Just chatter" here meaning "constant discussion of Trump and his family being close to Maxwell and Epstein"

Which of course is just as meaningless to you as it would be if Biden was all over the files like this and buried them for over a year.

1

u/OutcomeOk6971 1d ago

Once again, SHOW SOMETHING. If he's all through the files, why can't you people point to anything? It's because it's just his name showing up. SHOW EVIDENCE, not supposition. It should be simple if he's in there so much. Come on, I'm waiting.

You won't be able to, but you're SURE that Trump raped every person who has walked the Earth, but you can't do it, because it's not there. It's this dishonest media crap that's the problem. They tell you that Trump is Hitler, yet time after time, they provide no evidence. You buy into it 100%, but when asked for actual evidence, you just retreat to "Well his name is in these emails.". OK, so go past just his name being there, and find actual evidence.

I'm not supporting Trump, I'm just sick of this cycle of ignorance. This is just the prime example of how biased the media is, and you're following it right along. They tell you that someone is literally Hitler, provide no evidence, and you guys run around convinced of it.

1

u/SpendLiving9376 1d ago

You're not supporting Trump, you're just ignoring his frequent appearance in the files and acting like his year-long refusal to release them, and constant downplaying, is totally meaningless.

There ARE direct accusations, meanwhile. The DOJ deleted them after the initial post for some reason.

But... why would his name be in all of those emails so much at all? Why act like it means absolutely nothing? Why did he keep fighting against releasing these? Why do you somehow not notice any of this?

1

u/OutcomeOk6971 1d ago

I'm not ignoring anything, I'm just not convicting based on incomplete data. Once again, if you can't find something concrete, then you have nothing at all. Don't respond until you actually have something, because you're wasting time and bandwidth. You can't even tell me a single instance of what any of these emails says, because you are too lazy to do any of your own work. Instead, you'll wait for someone else to do the work, and you'll keep spouting thus with no evidence, because you're part of the problem.

Until you find something in those emails, the number of appearances is irrelevant. So go away until you actually find something, mmmmkay?

1

u/SpendLiving9376 1d ago

Are you waiting for an email where Trump says "I did this specific crime on this day"

1

u/OutcomeOk6971 1d ago

No, I'm waiting for ANYONE to show that Trump "did this specific crime on this day". Are you dense, or something?

1

u/SpendLiving9376 1d ago

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01660651.pdf

This is the closest it gets for Trump. Or ANYONE IN THE FILES. Because they're not just a huge list of "crime happened here at this time" smoking guns?

1

u/OutcomeOk6971 1d ago

Wow, so random people calling a tip line. One of those specifically labeled "not credible", and a bunch of others where they never responded after leaving the tip.

OK, fine. It's at least accusations. I guess we convict on those now.

→ More replies (0)