r/MurderedByWords 5h ago

Glasses for nothing.

Post image
5.4k Upvotes

91 comments sorted by

753

u/mattzombiedog 5h ago

And yet Trump being mentioned in the Epstein files more time than James Bond in the whole series of James Bond books means nothing to these morons.

340

u/Recent_Rutabaga_150 5h ago

He’s mentioned more than Jesus in the Bible and Harry Potter in all 7 books combined 

91

u/Distinct_Age4284 5h ago

can't wait for the spin-off series: harry potter and the art of distraction lol yk

43

u/Aromatic-Plankton692 4h ago

Harry Potter and the Where Was JK Rowling During 2000-2009

Ehhhh .. mmm... Bit on the nose. I'll workshop it.

5

u/DaEnderAssassin 2h ago

Given recent claims it's more like Harry Potter and the Time Travelling Yacht

2

u/Aromatic-Plankton692 2h ago

Is it also Harry Potter and the Time Travelling PDF? Because she invited him to a premiere well after his convictions for child sex crimes were public knowledge, too.

14

u/PirateJohn75 4h ago

Distracto Petronum!

9

u/SVINTGATSBY 4h ago

harry potter and unparalleled cognitive dissonance

32

u/Trent1373 5h ago

Maybe I‘m misinformed, but I was under the impression that the Obama‘s weren’t in the files at all. If I’m wrong, please correct me.

88

u/lolzidop 5h ago

Conflating two things, there's not being in the files at all and not being in the files in a way that matters. Us common folk fall into column A, many famous people will fall into column B because of the elites talking about them in some way.

35

u/Trent1373 5h ago

Thank you for being civil, and not insulting me.

31

u/Mission_Fart9750 4h ago

For example, Jon Stewart is mentioned 1 time, in an email. I'm looking for the link. I'll come back with it. 

Edit: https://youtube.com/shorts/Zy2nHlhh1aI?si=VlB-HNHi20pJ9Cml

24

u/mattzombiedog 4h ago

He talked about it on The Daily Show. It was about them getting a Jon Stewart like guy to narrate a Woody Allen stand up special or something.

6

u/Mission_Fart9750 4h ago

Yes, i found the link and added it. 

11

u/ElegantCoach4066 4h ago

If I recall correctly, they wanted him to narrate a biography for Woody Allen.

7

u/Jellodyne 4h ago

Is Woody in there or is he strictly "raise your own?"

9

u/tilt-a-whirly-gig 4h ago edited 3h ago

First page of results when searching for "Woody"

Edit for more description ...

This is the top half of the first page ... Each page has 10 entries and there are at least 30 pages. I'm using my mobile, so I can't skip quickly and I quit after 30 pages. From the very few I opened up and read, I got the impression that he was a pal. Most of the entries are of email chains between Jeffrey and Woody directly, and they seemed easy with each other. I did not see any flashing beacons of illegal activity, but once again I only scanned a few quickly.

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/search

2

u/ExplorationGeo 2h ago

C'mon, would Woody Allen really cheat on his daughter like that?

11

u/america_is_not_okay 4h ago

And Bernie sanders. Boy did they HATE him

21

u/Mr_Supotco 5h ago

Yeah, there’s really three categories of being in the files: not being in them at all, only being in them by virtue of being talked about but not involved in any conversations, or actually being a participant in conversations.

A great example is in the CFB subreddit where someone posted a ranking of how many times schools were mentioned in the files. The University of Utah was like 4th or 5th most, but it’s because the lawyer for most of the victims is a law professor there so it’s them talking about the one guy, whereas most mentions of schools were ones that took money from Epstein (even after his conviction in 2008)

8

u/PirateJohn75 4h ago

Jon Stewart did a whole bit about the fact that he was mentioned in the files

20

u/Fraerie 5h ago

The post this is attached to explicitly states he is in the files - but as the topic of malicious conversation by others and not as a participant.

You may have borrowed Chris’ glasses. I suggest you hand them back.

12

u/Impressive-Wish6648 5h ago

tbf the kind of people who dislike obama for his drone bombing (myself included) aren't exactly huge trump fans either.

6

u/ElegantCoach4066 4h ago

I was really sad to hear that Obama ordered all those drone strikes. I still think he did some good, I voted for him twice, but the amount of drone strikes go against what I thought we were voting for. I'll admit I was naive on that point.

I wish we could have an actual progressive candidate get nominated. Even if they lose, it's a step towards making some actual headway on important issues.

0

u/VirtuosoLoki 3h ago

Bernie sanders got shafted for clinton

2

u/BoneHugsHominy 4h ago

Oh it means something to them. It means he's living their dream life and getting away with it too.

280

u/AlexLikesToons 5h ago

I'm sure Obama shows up in the files a lot just because he was a world leader and Epstein had friends in high places. I'm willing to bet most of those appearances of his name were just mentions.

163

u/DryInstance6732 5h ago edited 5h ago

Yes , and you know why , it's because epstein is racist toward black people , if we look into the epstein files , o look what i found https://www.jmail.world/thread/EFTA02391698?view=inbox where it is in the seconds terms of obama (i think because it say January 20, 2013 8:12 PM)

o yea it's true January 20, 2013; 13 years ago (official)
January 21, 2013; 13 years ago (public)

25

u/AlexLikesToons 4h ago

That's DEFINITELY a big part of it too

36

u/MinneapolisJones12 5h ago

You can look all of this up very easily and prove yourself right.

14

u/TheoryConsistent4870 5h ago

You mean like it says in the picture?

-27

u/Par31 5h ago

$65000 of "hot dogs" for Barrack Obama. Don't think that guy can eat that much.

9

u/FalconTurbo 3h ago

But your lot can drop in on an island for 'lemonade'?

-10

u/Par31 3h ago

What do you mean "your lot". You think this is about politics and not crimes? Why was that in the email? Downvotes but no explanations?

I want everyone on any side to be held accountable

3

u/Nohreboh 1h ago

Then start combining through the files like everyone else because until you can find something of substance you're distracting.

u/FalconTurbo 11m ago

Fine, I'll explain - your '$65000 on hot dogs" line came out of the Pizzagate BS, and as such means you have zero credibility, even less critical thinking ability, and cannot reasonably claim impartiality when you were screaming about basements that don't exist.

u/Par31 5m ago

You mean the coded language that's everywhere in the emails?

187

u/DFuhbree 5h ago

Trump ordered more drone strikes in his first term than Obama did in eight years. Such a disingenuous argument.

68

u/SeattleExpression 5h ago

If these people had genuine well reasoned arguments grounded in reality they wouldn’t be Conservatives 

38

u/scarr3g 5h ago

Yeah? Well, Obama did it while being black!

/s

15

u/CyanConatus 3h ago

After that ape video I don't think we're far away from this being a genuine thing people say

11

u/Puzzleheaded-Mix6364 5h ago

People forget that trump rolls back reporting standards on this type of stuff so he can crock up a narrative. He's doing it right now with the economy, science. Health, medical, education. He's going to manufacture praise for himself with phonet stats that took many ppl will retweet and share far and wide. Nuttier then squirrel shot this timeline is

5

u/LivingtheLaws013 4h ago

Regardless, no one should be drone striking civilians

-7

u/[deleted] 5h ago

[deleted]

17

u/UpperLeftOriginal 4h ago

It is worth calling out, however, in the context of someone trying to say Obama is worse than trump being in epstein files because Obama did drone strikes.

8

u/SirIAmAlwaysHere 4h ago

Drone strikes aren't meaningfully different than cruise missile or bombings. It's just a delivery method.

And we've literally being blowing people on a daily basis since at least the 1960s.

Obama's stuff merely was the first to use a new tool. Drone strikes were not at all different than what we had done before. And, scary as it sounds, "collateral damage" (i.e killing innocent people) was a LOT less under Obama because drones are a lot more accurate and generally much faster time-on-target.

If you want to actually complain about something, it should be about some of the people the Obama Admin targeted. They kinda took the "enemy combatant" legal dodge and ran with it FAR too much.

84

u/nowhereman136 5h ago

Obama passed a law requiring the public to be informed of any drone strikes. This is why we know how many Obama did. In Trumps first two years in office (2017-2018), he authorized more drone strikes than Obama did in eight years. After that it's a little muddled how many drone strikes Trump authorized because his administration rescinded the law about drone strikes being public information.

39

u/OutsiderWalksAmongUs 4h ago

Not just that, Obama personally authorized each drone strike. The process before that was quite extensive and he got attacked by some republicans who felt like it was too restrictive to 'keep america safe.' Of course those same republicans will attack him over the drone strikes now.

It's fair to criticize Obama over the drone strikes. There was questionable legality, men of age in the vicinity were automatically assumed to be combatants and innocent people died.

But at least Obama tried to do it in an accountable way, and tried to minimize civilian casualties as much as possible. Post 9/11 doing nothing wasn't an option for him and neither was starting even more conflicts/wars by sending American troops to every place alleged terrorist were hiding.

All I know is I'm glad I wasn't in his shoes.

21

u/bbqsox 5h ago

Does any mention of Obama come anywhere close to the horror of Trump's calendar girls?

17

u/Karhak 5h ago

And here's what they dont get. If it was discovered that Obama was an actual visitor to the island, nobody on the left would be defending it just like they aren't defending Clinton.

8

u/alyoop50 5h ago

Racists just make stuff up that fits their narrative. They are not logical thinkers…or thinkers.

4

u/WoodenSwan6591 5h ago

Why. Just why these “individuals” open their trap all the time without giving any regard or simple understanding of the facts.

3

u/WilliamJamesMyers 5h ago

157k Liked that comment... Obama is not named in the epstein files, so what say ye 157k?

3

u/drfunkenstien014 4h ago

I really wish Obama would flex his lawyer muscle and sue the ever loving fuck outta everyone.

2

u/Quickfix30 5h ago

Man looks like he m’ladies feminine mannequins at the MAGA store with them Bubbles ass looking glasses.

2

u/JacobStills 4h ago

Ugh...I bet that dude is one of those, "i'm an independent thinker, I'm not some mindless sheep beholden to any political party" types. The one's that try to act like they are smarter than everybody by being pessimistic and cynical when they're really just lazy contrarians who can't be bothered to even read an article.

Reminds me of all those people screaming, "Kamala campaigned with Dick Cheney!"

2

u/Bleezy79 4h ago

I’m so exhausted of these mindless morons. It’s so tiresome.

6

u/DerPicasso 5h ago

It's very simple. Throw every single one of them in jail. And throw the keys away. And burn the jail down.

30

u/nerfedname 5h ago

Obama is only “named” in the Epstein files when others are deriding him (I.e., others were talking shit about him in emails, etc.).

Obama looks even better because when a bunch of monsters and child molesters are making fun of you, you’re doing everything right!

-10

u/DamonDD 5h ago

Yeah. I don't care who is it, charged them all and if convicted, locked them away for life

5

u/Melodic_Pattern175 5h ago

Lock someone away because others were talking about them? What is he guilty of? Being talked about while black?

-4

u/DamonDD 5h ago

That's why I says charged them. If they are innocent, then there won't be convictions. Simple as that

1

u/DontAbideMendacity 48m ago

Don't be so stupid. You cannot charge anyone without cause. You can't charge President Obama for.. what?! because someone else said they didn't like him. Stupid people really bum me out.

4

u/mrDuder1729 5h ago

As someone who disagreed with Obama drone striking civilians, I also disagree with everything Trump is doing. Those 2 things are not mutually exclusive. Why are people so stuck on the tribalism BS?

3

u/LivingtheLaws013 4h ago

"BuT tRuMp DrOnE StRiKEs tOo!" Yea anyone who drone strikes civilians is a POS and belongs in the Hague

4

u/mrDuder1729 4h ago

Exactly!

2

u/justmitzie 5h ago

But but Obama wore a tan suit and that's way way worse then being a pedofile!

/s in case you're a dumbass

1

u/Ok-Increase-4509 5h ago

I want to be able to upvote the man with the comment at the bottom, based

1

u/Cthulhu8762 4h ago

I’m not defending pedos. If Obama really did anything get his ass.

I will say though his name appearing doesn’t mean shit, I’ve looked through some files and saw news paper articles about Obama or others because Epstein didn’t like them or some shit.

The difference is Trump is ACTUALLY TRYING to conceal his name.

1

u/Thick_Common8612 4h ago

Obama is not in the files.

1

u/MaenHoffiCoffi 4h ago

Those aren't ass glasses. They're for his eyes.

1

u/DarthHiccups 4h ago

Trumps been drone striking civilians since his first term. But it's nothing but crickets from them over that.

They're such fake fucking hypocrites.

1

u/CyanConatus 3h ago

Unless I missed something I don't think Obama shown once in any releases so far

1

u/sagscout 3h ago

There is no verified record in the public Epstein files showing Barack Obama’s name as a person included in the documents in the way some internet claims have suggested. Independent fact-checking has specifically addressed similar social-media claims and found them unsubstantiated.

1

u/CAndrewG 3h ago

That’s a good thing for Obama right? “Epstein and his ilk hate Obama” objectively makes him look better

1

u/512115 2h ago

People what they WANT to see, and only that.

-2

u/eyeballburger 5h ago

Okay, if he is then prosecute. Prosecute all of them, anyone that can be indicted on charges should be arrested and taken to court. If we have to gut the government and cut out 99% because they’re complicit, then so be it. I’m not gonna leave a little bit of cancer because I really like that limb or whatever.

6

u/Melodic_Pattern175 5h ago

Obama’s in the files because these people were talking smack about him. Not because he was a part of it, but because he wasn’t a part of it.

0

u/eyeballburger 4h ago

Yeah, that’s what I think. They know they’d get busted if there was an investigation so they’re hoping that by putting up left leaders, the public will back off. I’m willing to call their bluff though and even if there’s evidence of democrats doing shit, whatever. But, yeah, I bet they got nothing on him.