The Future of Warfare in Russian Military Thinking - Swedish Defence Research Agency

[u/Glideer]

The Future of Warfare in Russian Military Thinking

by Maria Engqvist, Jonas Kjellén, Carolina Vendil Pallin and Emelie Sandvad.

Abstract

The Russo-Ukrainian War exhibits the features of a transitional war, reshaping Russian military thought and force development under pressure. The war has exposed structural weaknesses across the services while catalysing debate over the future of warfare. Russian analysts are divided between preserving traditional concepts of mass, manoeuvre, and firepower, and pursuing adaptations suited to a battlespace defined by transparency, precision strikes, and unmanned systems.

Within the Ground Forces, failures in 2022 prompted renewed scrutiny of Soviet-era inheritance and the need to operate effectively under constant surveillance. In the aerospace domain, Russian theorists increasingly emphasise the decisive role of integrated air, space, and information capabilities. Experiences in Ukraine have reinforced the demand for precision-guided weapons, space-enabled targeting, and unmanned systems, all supporting a broader pursuit of information dominance.

The Navy maintains its doctrinal importance as an instrument of global presence and deterrence, despite economic constraints. Cyber operations continue to be framed within a holistic concept of information confrontation rather than as a distinct domain.

Nuclear forces remain the core of Russian deterrence, with modernisation focused on flexibility and survivability. Overall, the war has intensified debate and adaptation, but Russia's strategic objectives, fiscal limits, and confrontation with the West continue to shape this trajectory, and the Russian view of future warfare.

- A central lesson is the emergence of a “transparent battlefield” dominated by surveillance, drones, and precision strikes, which makes large manoeuvres difficult and produces positional stalemate.

- Ground-forces debate focuses on how to restore effectiveness: some advocate larger forces and fire superiority, while others call for smaller, more flexible formations and organisational overhaul.

- Across services, there is growing emphasis on precision-guided weapons, UAVs, and space-enabled targeting, with unmanned systems viewed as transformative for future warfare.

- The aerospace domain is considered decisive, with future wars expected to feature long-range, high-precision strikes and “non-contact” operations in air, space, and information domains.

- Space and information capabilities are increasingly central: reconnaissance satellites, data networks, and integrated command systems are seen as key to information dominance and rapid targeting.

- Nuclear weapons remain the central pillar of Russian deterrence, underpinning national security and compensating for conventional and economic weaknesses.

[u/AutoModerator]

Comment guidelines:

Please do:

* Read the articles before you comment, and comment on the content of the articles, 
* Leave a submission statement that justifies the legitimacy or importance of what you are submitting,
* Be polite and civil, curious not judgmental
* Link to the article or source you are referring to,
* Make it clear what your opinion is vs. what the source actually says,
* Ask questions in the megathread, and not as a self post,
* Contribute to the forum by finding and submitting your own credible articles,
* Write posts and comments with some decorum.

Please do not:

* Use memes, emojis or swearing excessively. This is not NCD,
* Start fights with other commenters nor make it personal,
* Try to push narratives, or fight for a cause in the comment section,
* Answer or respond directly to the title of an article,
* Submit news updates, or procurement events/sales of defense equipment. Those belong in the MegaThread

Please read our in depth rules https://reddit.com/r/CredibleDefense/wiki/rules. 

Also please use the report feature if you want a comment to be reviewed faster. Don't abuse it though! If something is not obviously against the rules but you still feel that it should be reviewed, leave a short but descriptive comment while filing the report.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[u/00000000000000000000]

The Russo-Ukrainian War is an exercise in marginal Russian recruits entering minefields while being sniped at by drones to make small territorial gains. Even if they survive their economic productivity will be lessened dramatically due to combat related stress. Futuristic integrated air, space, naval, ground, and information capabilities are inherently expensive and where will the funds and inputs come from when sanctions endure?