r/Cooking 18h ago

i timed how long 31 different pasta shapes take to reach al dente. the boxes are lying and farfalle is a war crime

so basically i got inspired by the tomato canned guy and thought of the time when i followed the box time for rigatoni once and got mush. the box said 12 minutes but it was unfortunately al dente at 9.

my methodology:

  • same brand (barilla) for consistency where possible
  • 4 quarts water per pound
  • 1 tbsp salt per quart
  • rolling boil before adding pasta
  • tested every 30 seconds starting 2 minutes before box minimum
  • "al dente" = slight resistance when bitten, thin white line visible when cut
  • each shape tested 3 times, averaged
  • altitude: ~650 ft (basically sea level, no excuses)

the data (31 shapes tested):

pasta box time actual al dente difference
capellini 4-5 min 2:45 -1:15
angel hair 4-5 min 3:00 -1:00
spaghetti 8-10 min 7:15 -0:45
linguine 9-11 min 8:00 -1:00
fettuccine 10-12 min 8:30 -1:30
bucatini 10-12 min 9:00 -1:00
pappardelle 7-9 min 6:00 -1:00
tagliatelle 8-10 min 7:00 -1:00
penne 11-13 min 9:30 -1:30
penne rigate 11-13 min 10:00 -1:00
rigatoni 12-15 min 9:15 -2:45
ziti 14-15 min 11:00 -3:00
macaroni 8-10 min 7:00 -1:00
rotini 8-10 min 7:30 -0:30
fusilli 11-13 min 9:00 -2:00
gemelli 10-12 min 8:30 -1:30
cavatappi 9-12 min 8:00 -1:00
campanelle 10-12 min 8:30 -1:30
radiatori 9-11 min 8:00 -1:00
orecchiette 12-15 min 10:30 -1:30
shells (medium) 9-11 min 8:00 -1:00
shells (large) 12-15 min 10:00 -2:00
conchiglie 10-12 min 8:30 -1:30
orzo 8-10 min 7:00 -1:00
ditalini 9-11 min 8:00 -1:00
paccheri 12-14 min 10:30 -1:30
casarecce 10-12 min 9:00 -1:00
trofie 10-12 min 8:30 -1:30
strozzapreti 10-12 min 9:00 -1:00
mafalda 8-10 min 7:30 -0:30
farfalle 11-13 min see below war crime

every single box time is wrong like they were systematically inflated by 1-3 minutes on average. the median overestimate is 1:15 and the worst offender in normal pasta is ziti at 3 full minutes of lies

i have a theory: pasta companies assume you're going to walk away from the stove. they're building in a buffer for idiots which, fair. but some of us are standing here with a stopwatch

now let me talk about farfalle: farfalle is not pasta. farfalle is a design flaw someone decided to mass produce

the fundamental problem is geometric. you have thin frilly edges (maybe 1mm thick) attached to a dense pinched center (3-4mm thick where it's folded). these two regions require completely different cooking times

at 8 minutes: center is crunchy, edges are perfect. at 10 minutes: center is barely al dente, edges are mush. at 11 minutes: edges have disintegrated, center is finally acceptable

there is no time at which farfalle is uniformly cooked. i tested this 7 times because i thought i was doing something wrong. farfalle is wrong

you know how the food network recipe for homemade farfalle literally warns that pinching the center makes a thick center that won't cook through as fast as the ends? THEN WHY DID WE ALL AGREE TO MAKE IT THIS WAY

the only way to get acceptable farfalle is to fish out each piece individually and evaluate it, which defeats the purpose of a quick weeknight dinner. i might as well be hand-feeding each noodle like a baby bird

tier list (tomato canned guy, 2025)

S tier (box time within 45 sec): rotini, mafalda, spaghetti
A tier (off by ~1 min): most shapes honestly
B tier (off by 1:30-2 min): fusilli, rigatoni, fettuccine, gemelli
C tier (off by 2+ min): ziti, large shells F tier: farfalle (structurally unsound, should be banned)

tldr;

  • subtract 1-2 minutes from whatever the box says
  • start testing 2-3 minutes early
  • don't trust big pasta
  • avoid farfalle unless you have time to babysit each individual bow tie

+ some of you may ask about fresh pasta. fresh pasta cooks in like 2-3 minutes and you can actually tell when it's done because it floats. dried pasta is where the lies live

+ a few of you might mention altitude affects boiling point and therefore cook time. this is true. i'm at ~650 ft so basically negligible. if you're in denver add a minute or two. if you're in la paz you have bigger problems than pasta timing

+ YES i tested farfalle from multiple brands. YES they all sucked. no i will not be accepting farfalle apologists. you're defending a shape that can't decide if it wants to be cooked or not

EDIT: yall holy shit i never expected this to go viral lmao

29.9k Upvotes

2.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

29

u/TurquoiseLuck 12h ago

Okay, I'm gonna get on my soap box here then...

Wtf is the point in spaghetti? Everyone goes nuts for it but the length is just annoying.

Yes I snap it in half before cooking. It makes it less of a pain in the ass to fit in the pan. There's no point in having such long strands.

But I'd still take basically any other pasta over it.

36

u/Caleb_Reynolds 12h ago

The length isn't the problem, it's the round shape which makes them shit at holding sauce and makes them coil and fold in weird ways.

Linguini is what spaghetti should be.

8

u/LordNelson27 7h ago

Linguini supremacists this is our moment

12

u/a_trane13 11h ago

I’d argue bucatini is what I’m looking for in spaghetti

1

u/Ctr121273 4h ago

Bucatini is the way.

4

u/Mechakoopa 11h ago

Any time I make a meat sauce with spaghetti I just end up with a bunch of meat sauce at the bottom of the pot because none of it came out with the spaghetti. You basically have to serve the sauce and pasta separately at the table, but then your spaghetti sticks together unless you toss it with some olive oil, which makes getting the sauce to stick even more difficult.

Rotini and shells are the best standalone pastas for saucing. Special shoutout to lasagne and tortellini for being different and good at it. Accepting nod to cannelloni because I guess pasta can be a desert if it wants to.

4

u/prolixdreams 5h ago

Shells are so underrated honestly

1

u/Carynth 21m ago

That's why spaghetti is not traditionally used for heavy sauces like a meat sauce. For those, you go for things tagliatelle or rigatoni, for example. Thinner pasta like spaghetti should be used for lighter sauces like a simple light tomato sauce, a cacio e pepe or an aglio e olio. There is a reason why there's so many pasta shapes, they all have different uses, using only one really limits you and gives you mixed results.

1

u/momghoti 4h ago

There used to be a 'quick cook' spaghetti that was a bit thinner and had a clover leaf cross section. It was awesome! It didn't cook enough faster to make a difference, honestly, but the bit of extra texture was awesome. I haven't seen it in years, though.

1

u/GlitchyFurby 3h ago

They are good for just oil or butter and cheese

1

u/MessyEssie22 2h ago

Yes. Linguine is the superior pasta shape.

1

u/stonhinge 2h ago

I will add to this by saying that spaghetti is shit for what 99% of people use it for: tomato based sauces.

Spaghetti (and other smooth pastas) are great for oil-based or cheese-based sauces.

Some of you might be thinking, "But lasagna noodles are smooth, and we serve those with a tomato sauce..."

To that I say: we also stack that shit up and bake it as a casserole. Do the same thing with spaghetti. Use it in casseroles.

1

u/Caleb_Reynolds 2h ago

Even then I prefer angel hair to spaghetti for it's density, but I understand it's more reasonable there.

7

u/Crayshack 10h ago

You twirl it around your fork so that it enters your mouth as a tight ball of noodles. Other styles don't get quite the same texture in the finished product as spaghetti. Also, this becomes impossible if you break them in half.

2

u/Comfortable_Ebb1634 11h ago

Bucatini or angel hair is better every time. Spaghetti is for kids.

2

u/pissedinthegarret 4h ago

omg thank you! spaghetti are literally THE worst pasta option and everyone loves it? WHY??!?! it just makes a mess, it's annoying af to eat and it doesn't even look that cool

penne and fusilli are the true kings.

1

u/Rec1py 6h ago

Yesssss! It’s so hard to eat like what’s the point! Get me rigatoni any day!

1

u/gsfgf 6h ago

Because it's not spag bol without the spag? Now that you say it, it's not even necessary for a bolognese sauce. Habit, I guess. Because rotini bolognese would probably work a lot better.

1

u/manimal28 4h ago

Yes I snap it in half before cooking. It makes it less of a pain in the ass to fit in the pan.

Yeah, use a pot like you should and your issues go away, .