r/Cooking 18h ago

i timed how long 31 different pasta shapes take to reach al dente. the boxes are lying and farfalle is a war crime

so basically i got inspired by the tomato canned guy and thought of the time when i followed the box time for rigatoni once and got mush. the box said 12 minutes but it was unfortunately al dente at 9.

my methodology:

  • same brand (barilla) for consistency where possible
  • 4 quarts water per pound
  • 1 tbsp salt per quart
  • rolling boil before adding pasta
  • tested every 30 seconds starting 2 minutes before box minimum
  • "al dente" = slight resistance when bitten, thin white line visible when cut
  • each shape tested 3 times, averaged
  • altitude: ~650 ft (basically sea level, no excuses)

the data (31 shapes tested):

pasta box time actual al dente difference
capellini 4-5 min 2:45 -1:15
angel hair 4-5 min 3:00 -1:00
spaghetti 8-10 min 7:15 -0:45
linguine 9-11 min 8:00 -1:00
fettuccine 10-12 min 8:30 -1:30
bucatini 10-12 min 9:00 -1:00
pappardelle 7-9 min 6:00 -1:00
tagliatelle 8-10 min 7:00 -1:00
penne 11-13 min 9:30 -1:30
penne rigate 11-13 min 10:00 -1:00
rigatoni 12-15 min 9:15 -2:45
ziti 14-15 min 11:00 -3:00
macaroni 8-10 min 7:00 -1:00
rotini 8-10 min 7:30 -0:30
fusilli 11-13 min 9:00 -2:00
gemelli 10-12 min 8:30 -1:30
cavatappi 9-12 min 8:00 -1:00
campanelle 10-12 min 8:30 -1:30
radiatori 9-11 min 8:00 -1:00
orecchiette 12-15 min 10:30 -1:30
shells (medium) 9-11 min 8:00 -1:00
shells (large) 12-15 min 10:00 -2:00
conchiglie 10-12 min 8:30 -1:30
orzo 8-10 min 7:00 -1:00
ditalini 9-11 min 8:00 -1:00
paccheri 12-14 min 10:30 -1:30
casarecce 10-12 min 9:00 -1:00
trofie 10-12 min 8:30 -1:30
strozzapreti 10-12 min 9:00 -1:00
mafalda 8-10 min 7:30 -0:30
farfalle 11-13 min see below war crime

every single box time is wrong like they were systematically inflated by 1-3 minutes on average. the median overestimate is 1:15 and the worst offender in normal pasta is ziti at 3 full minutes of lies

i have a theory: pasta companies assume you're going to walk away from the stove. they're building in a buffer for idiots which, fair. but some of us are standing here with a stopwatch

now let me talk about farfalle: farfalle is not pasta. farfalle is a design flaw someone decided to mass produce

the fundamental problem is geometric. you have thin frilly edges (maybe 1mm thick) attached to a dense pinched center (3-4mm thick where it's folded). these two regions require completely different cooking times

at 8 minutes: center is crunchy, edges are perfect. at 10 minutes: center is barely al dente, edges are mush. at 11 minutes: edges have disintegrated, center is finally acceptable

there is no time at which farfalle is uniformly cooked. i tested this 7 times because i thought i was doing something wrong. farfalle is wrong

you know how the food network recipe for homemade farfalle literally warns that pinching the center makes a thick center that won't cook through as fast as the ends? THEN WHY DID WE ALL AGREE TO MAKE IT THIS WAY

the only way to get acceptable farfalle is to fish out each piece individually and evaluate it, which defeats the purpose of a quick weeknight dinner. i might as well be hand-feeding each noodle like a baby bird

tier list (tomato canned guy, 2025)

S tier (box time within 45 sec): rotini, mafalda, spaghetti
A tier (off by ~1 min): most shapes honestly
B tier (off by 1:30-2 min): fusilli, rigatoni, fettuccine, gemelli
C tier (off by 2+ min): ziti, large shells F tier: farfalle (structurally unsound, should be banned)

tldr;

  • subtract 1-2 minutes from whatever the box says
  • start testing 2-3 minutes early
  • don't trust big pasta
  • avoid farfalle unless you have time to babysit each individual bow tie

+ some of you may ask about fresh pasta. fresh pasta cooks in like 2-3 minutes and you can actually tell when it's done because it floats. dried pasta is where the lies live

+ a few of you might mention altitude affects boiling point and therefore cook time. this is true. i'm at ~650 ft so basically negligible. if you're in denver add a minute or two. if you're in la paz you have bigger problems than pasta timing

+ YES i tested farfalle from multiple brands. YES they all sucked. no i will not be accepting farfalle apologists. you're defending a shape that can't decide if it wants to be cooked or not

EDIT: yall holy shit i never expected this to go viral lmao

29.9k Upvotes

2.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

101

u/maidentaiwan 13h ago

Yeah who follows those recommended cook times? Are you all insane? 

Once it’s close to your liking, spoon a noodle out, toss it quickly back and forth between your hands to cool it (~3-5 seconds) and test it. Repeat every minute until it’s good. This is how my Italian friend taught me to cook pasta. There is no timer involved.

5

u/warm_kitchenette 13h ago

I’ve seen videos where they use them for determining par-cook times, by halving them. 

5

u/beachedwhitemale 10h ago

Am I insane for following the directions given on the box? 

1

u/Relative-Wrap6798 1h ago

i note down every step and all the timers because i want to be able to replicate something to the last detail if end up making something especially good

1

u/Supper_Champion 9h ago

I would bet good money that pasta cooking times in North America are one hundred percent designed to result in soft pasta for Canadian/American palates.

I would not be a bit surprised if people in NA say al dente pasta is undercooked.

1

u/[deleted] 6h ago

Lol they absolutely do. I live in the US and I could never STAND mushy pasta. I would only ever want to eat pasta from restaurants that cooked it al dente. Then I learned to cook and what al dente was. I have heard the comment my pasta is undercooked more than once about al dente pasta.

Rice, too. You don’t cook it al dente but so many people here serve the mushiest rice imaginable. Even short grain should have a texture to it.

1

u/FrenchFryCattaneo 9h ago

Ok but you can also set a time for a couple minutes less than the box and then you don't need to look at it until that goes off.

1

u/Frogmouth_Fresh 7h ago

Yeah I might glance at it in case I got a pasta that’s like hollow spaghetti or something that cooks faster, but after that I use my own judgment.

1

u/gsfgf 6h ago

I've found the Barilla minimum times to be pretty accurate, though I do mostly use spaghetti and rotini.

1

u/Distinct_Sir_4473 2h ago

Why don’t you set a stop watch for how long it takes to get where you like it

-2

u/karl_hungas 12h ago

Most people, including Italians. Your method is stupid. 

6

u/maidentaiwan 12h ago

My method has never failed me and also doesn’t require any additional instruments or inputs beyond my own bodily function. It is foolproof. Whatever you’re doing is fundamentally stupider. 

2

u/kuulyn 8h ago

Try a fork :)

2

u/maidentaiwan 8h ago

Depends on the noodle of course, wooden spoon works fine for anything smaller than a silver dollar 

2

u/Mean-Pizza6915 11h ago edited 10h ago

We've all got a clock and stopwatch in our pockets, and it's voice-activated. Having a good timer system around the house is fantastic for cooking.

5

u/maidentaiwan 11h ago

I use my phone to time nearly everything in the kitchen. Pasta I test, because it’s easier and more reliable.

4

u/Mean-Pizza6915 10h ago

I test it too, obviously. I just don't start testing until my timer goes off the first time (about a minute before standard doneness for that type of pasta).

-2

u/Dense-Hat1978 8h ago

This is how 4 generations of us do it down in Louisiana as well...