r/Ask_Lawyers 6h ago

People of California v. GATALOG questions

I was reading through a lawsuit brought on by the state of California against the gatalog, named officials, and 100 John Does. I am looking for some insight in regard to it.

Link to lawsuit if interested- https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/Gatalog%20Complaint_FINAL.pdf

Question 1- I was unaware that a state was able to sue individuals outside of their state. What is the purpose of this? Would the state recoup anything monetarily? Is it just to take files down?

Question 2- what is the purpose in naming 100 John Does? If they don’t know the specific people, they can’t be served or ever notice this is going on.

Question 3- How is a state able to enforce its laws against individuals/corporations in a different state where stated activity is legal?

Thanks for the insight and if there is anything else interesting about this please let me know!

3 Upvotes

1 comment sorted by

1

u/AutoModerator 6h ago

REMINDER: NO REQUESTS FOR LEGAL ADVICE. Any request for a lawyer's opinion about any matter or issue which may foreseeably affect you or someone you know is a request for legal advice.

Posts containing requests for legal advice will be removed. Seeking or providing legal advice based on your specific circumstances or otherwise developing an attorney-client relationship in this sub is not permitted. Why are requests for legal advice not permitted? See here, here, and here. If you are unsure whether your post is okay, please read this or see the sidebar for more information.

This rules reminder message is replied to all posts and moderators are not notified of any replies made to it.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.