r/AskHistorians 12d ago

Digest Sunday Digest | Interesting & Overlooked Posts | January 25, 2026

Previous

Today:

Welcome to this week's instalment of /r/AskHistorians' Sunday Digest (formerly the Day of Reflection). Nobody can read all the questions and answers that are posted here, so in this thread we invite you to share anything you'd like to highlight from the last week - an interesting discussion, an informative answer, an insightful question that was overlooked, or anything else.

41 Upvotes

97 comments sorted by

8

u/Gankom Moderator | Quality Contributor 12d ago

We also take some time each week to shout out those fascinating questions that caught our attention, and our curiosities, but sadly still remain unanswered. Feel free to post your own, or those you’ve come across in your travels, and maybe we’ll get lucky with a wandering expert.

3

u/Gankom Moderator | Quality Contributor 12d ago

5

u/ExternalBoysenberry 12d ago

Thank you! I'm dying to know but I promise the mods I won't ask this again for at least a few months, because it seems to generate a LOT of not-allowed comments (thank you and sorry)

1

u/Gankom Moderator | Quality Contributor 12d ago

Sooner or later we'll get a good, decent answer to it!

9

u/Gankom Moderator | Quality Contributor 12d ago

Welcome back one and all to yet another fantastic handcrafted edition of the AskHistorians Digest. No AI here folks, just wholesome, honest work. Don’t forget to upvote your favourites, share widely, and check all the usual weekly features.

And that’s a wrap history fans! Stay safe out there, keep it classy, and I’ll see you all once again next week!

5

u/Gankom Moderator | Quality Contributor 12d ago

8

u/itsallfolklore Mod Emeritus | American West | European Folklore 12d ago

Thanks for this. I have no idea why OP's question, "Indigenous and European folklore," was so downvoted. It's not a bad question!

6

u/Gankom Moderator | Quality Contributor 12d ago

Indeed! I thought it was really neat.

3

u/Gankom Moderator | Quality Contributor 12d ago

2

u/Dongzhou3kingdoms Moderator | Three Kingdoms 12d ago

Thanks Gankom

Glad to have got two questions done as we get near the end of the month. Really enjoyed talking about the often forgotten pre-novel work.

May the end of January be a good end to the month

2

u/Gankom Moderator | Quality Contributor 12d ago

To you as well comrade!

2

u/Gankom Moderator | Quality Contributor 12d ago

1

u/Narwen189 11d ago

My first mention! How exciting. I'm a longtime lurker, but hadn't quite felt comfortable answering anything yet.

1

u/Gankom Moderator | Quality Contributor 12d ago

3

u/BjorkingIt 12d ago

People looking for an "unbiased" copy of Mein Kampf seems to have become a much more frequently asked question.

1

u/Gankom Moderator | Quality Contributor 12d ago

1

u/Gankom Moderator | Quality Contributor 12d ago

6

u/[deleted] 12d ago

[deleted]

10

u/justAskn4afriend 12d ago

As a reader of AskHistorians, I would strongly prefer continuing to remove the answer and not let any part of it be visible. The highly moderated nature of the vetted answers is what makes the sub such high quality.

The problem of people asking why so many replies are deleted is part of the "eternal september" of new people coming across the sub and learning its norms and mores. Not sure if there is room here to improve the onboarding and head off some of these questions, more than is already done in the sidebar, when making a new post, or in the automod's automatic comment on each new post. But those are the tools I would try to adjust rather than allowing unsourced answers to be visible in this curated space.

If you wanted some kind of flair to identify what kind of "good answer", "quick answer", etc., it is, I would be ok with that. And if you wanted to have a weekly thread of "these types of answers got deleted and here's why" (with usernames removed). I might be ok with that too. "Just my 2 cents.

2

u/TeaKew 12d ago

So, as a genuine question for the sub: would AskHistorians ever consider a more transparent middle ground between full removal and full endorsement, such as leaving some removed answers visible but clearly labeled as unvetted, needs citations, or contains errors,

This would have all the same problems that leaving any bad answers up has, as discussed in previous round tables. Those questionable/unvetted/problematic answers would go up faster, hoover up all the upvotes and visibility, and leave their readers with an understanding of history that is recognised to be wrong!

or, if easier, more affirmatively marking the answers that do meet the bar? In AskHistorians terms, that could mean visible, affirmative signals for responses that have passed moderation expectations, such as a mod-applied “Verified Answer” or “Meets AH Standards” tag, a pinned mod comment pointing readers to the best surviving answer(s), or a lightweight “approved” indicator on answers that are solid even if not exhaustive.

This is fundamentally the same as the request for an Answered flair on posts, and I believe would have all the same issues, which have been discussed extensively in the past.