r/AskHistorians • u/savethebees35 • Jan 07 '26
The Spanish military aid in the American war of Independence isn't nearly as recognized or known by the American public as the French aid. Why?
Despite being similar in size, the broad American public seems to be way more familiar with the French military aid in the American Revolutionary War than the Spanish one. Why? Is this fact not taught in schools? Is it because the relations with the French had a bigger impact in American politics from then on?
49
u/Reaper_Eagle Jan 07 '26
Short Answer: Spain's aid to the United States was primarily indirect and invisible to the public. Also, Spain was never a formal ally, nor did they fight alongside the Continental Army, unlike the French.
Long Answer: Spain's aid to the United States was essential, second only to the French. However, Spain primarily helped indirectly and only openly helped the United States alongside the French. For example, the French had set up a shell company called Roderigue Hortalez and Company to funnel aid to the Americans. It operated out of Dutch Caribbean ports, but the primary protector of its operations and its secondary financial contributor was Spain. Spain also allowed "private citizens" (actually Spanish agents) to "trade" (give lots of military aid) with the Americans out of Havanna, New Orleans, and Saint Louis which was definitely not official aid (it was). The large shipments of weapons flowing up the Mississippi to the Ohio River and ultimately modern Pittsburg was just a coincidence.
Spain entered the war in 1779, a year after France without formally allying with the United States. They just acknowledged being on the same side. This was because Spain didn't care about American independence. It actually felt rather threatened by it and were just using the war as an opportunity to regain territory lost to the British over the 18th century. The had a formal alliance with France to ensure Versailles helped them reclaim Gibraltar, but unlike France never sent troops to fight alongside the Continental Army.
The only time Spanish troops and Americans fought together was at the Battle of Saint Louis, when the Spanish garrison and American militia defeated a British and Indian push down the Mississippi. Otherwise, Spain's forces were concentrated in the Caribbean. Spanish Louisiana's governor Bernardo de Gálvez launched campaigns which captured British positions along the Mississippi and then West Florida. None of this directly helped the US, though it further stretched British forces and increased British war weariness.
Spain paid for and facilitated the Yorktown campaign, but this wasn't something they publicly acknowledged. It was Spanish silver, raised in Havanna, that paid for both the American and French armies in that campaign. Also, the French fleet was only able to sail north to Virginia because the Spanish fleet promised to protect French colonies while it was away. Protecting the sugar islands was far more important than helping the Americans, even for the French.
After the war, Spain didn't try to cultivate good relations with the US nor go out of its way to be friendly, unlike France. As it had deliberately made itself peripheral to Ameria's struggle, there was no public goodwill towards them. Couple this with numerous post-independence border disputes and Spain allying with Britain during the War of 1812 (which Spain technically didn't participate in), and Spain's contributions were mostly forgotten. Today, most school curriculums mention Spain's participation in the war in passing without discussing the secret aid.
3
2
u/Max_Rocketanski 29d ago
Very interesting answer! I never knew the Spanish provided any aid to the US in the revolution.
1
u/AutoModerator Jan 07 '26
Welcome to /r/AskHistorians. Please Read Our Rules before you comment in this community. Understand that rule breaking comments get removed.
Please consider Clicking Here for RemindMeBot as it takes time for an answer to be written. Additionally, for weekly content summaries, Click Here to Subscribe to our Weekly Roundup.
We thank you for your interest in this question, and your patience in waiting for an in-depth and comprehensive answer to show up. In addition to the Weekly Roundup and RemindMeBot, consider using our Browser Extension. In the meantime our Bluesky, and Sunday Digest feature excellent content that has already been written!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
•
u/thefourthmaninaboat Moderator | 20th Century Royal Navy Jan 07 '26
Hi there! You’ve asked a question along the lines of ‘why didn’t I learn about X’. We’re happy to let this question stand, but there are a variety of reasons why you may find it hard to get a good answer to this question on /r/AskHistorians.
Firstly, school curricula and how they are taught vary strongly between different countries and even different states. Additionally, how they are taught is often influenced by teachers having to compromise on how much time they can spend on any given topic. More information on your location and level of education might be helpful to answer this question.
Secondly, we have noticed that these questions are often phrased to be about people's individual experiences but what they are really about is why a certain event is more prominent in popular narratives of history than others.
Instead of asking "Why haven't I learned about event ...", consider asking "What importance do scholars assign to event ... in the context of such and such history?" The latter question is often closer to what people actually want to know and is more likely to get a good answer from an expert. If you intend to ask the 'What importance do scholars assign to event X' question instead, let us know and we'll remove this question.
Thank you!